Best Blockchain Frameworks You Should Know About
We describe the 10 most promising blockchain frameworks for private and public networks. Tell about their features, advantages and disadvantages.
The blockchain frameworks are a software solution that simplifies the development, deployment, and support of technically complex products. Usually, the framework contains only the blockchain framework and its basic modules, and all specific components are implemented by the developer based on them. Thereby, a high development rate is achieved while maintaining the stability and performance of the final product.
An open source framework for creating and launching virtually any decentralized online services on the Ethereum (DApps) that operate on the basis of smart contracts. The concept of the project was proposed by Vitalik Buterin in 2013, but it was only possible to implement it in 2015.
Ethereum is based on four key components:
1. EVM. This is the so-called “full Turing environment” in which you can run DApps written in one of several popular programming languages. In other words, instead of creating a separate framework for each language or application, they all work on the same blockchain. This makes the Dapps development process more efficient and simple.
2. Smart contracts. Computer algorithm for the exchange of cryptocurrency, real estate, gold or other value without the participation of third parties - the guarantors. Smart contract is executed automatically subject to certain conditions specified in its code.
3. DApps. Decentralized applications that use smart contracts for various purposes: putting digital signatures, forecasting stock markets, guaranteeing the transfer of valuables, and the like. More than half of live DApps - Ethereum applications.
4. Performance. A set of software solutions aimed at improving network performance. Ethereum now uses Merkle trees to optimize transactional hashing and increase potential for scalability.
Now Ethereum's popularity is declining, as ICO's popularity is falling due to pressure from government regulators. But you should take into account the fact that this framework was often used by scammers to launch scam projects. Consequently, reducing the number of scammers leads to a decrease in the popularity of Ethereum, which does not affect the relevance of the Ethereum framework among honest developers.
Now the Bitcoin framework is losing in popularity with the rest of the blockchains, since it is old and slow. But you shouldn’t write it off, because Bitcoin has the largest capitalization and audience, and it also develops, as a decentralized system - the community decides in which direction the network will develop, what update to bring and how to wait.
Thanks to this, a lot of talented programmers who create unique solutions work on the Bitcoin code: Segregated Witness (SegWit), Lightning Network and others. And, importantly, these innovations do not change the decentralized nature of the platform and do not sacrifice security for the sake of speed - the main reason for the popularity of Bitcoin among blockchain-enthusiasts.
Over 100 companies participate in Hyperledger. Regular membership costs 50 thousand dollars, premium - 250 thousand dollars. Notable participants from the financial sector are: JP Morgan, London Stock Exchange (LSE), Deutsche Boerse and CME. From IT giants - Cisco, IBM, Microsoft, Fujitsu and Intel. SWIFT, Moscow Exchange, ABN Amro, BNP Paribas, Wells Fargo and hundreds of other companies also joined the Linux Foundation project.
Here are some of the Hyperledger frameworks:
2. Sawtooth. Intel's modular platform that implements the “Proof of elapsed time (PoeT)” consensus algorithm. Sawtooth is typically used to tokenize logistics and sales chains.
3. Burrow. A client with a built-in virtual machine that can work with Ethereum specifications.
4. Iroha. Japanese project based on Hyperledger Fabric, focused on the creation of mobile applications.
5. Indy. A project from Sovrin Foundation, whose main function is digital authentication in systems based on distribution registries.
By restricting access in the context of Corda, we mean that transaction information is not broadcast to all network nodes. Information about it is available only to nodes that have confirmed legitimate interests in those assets that participate in the transaction. In other words, if this is a transaction between Bank A and Bank B, then only the nodes of these two structures will receive information about the transaction.
Such an approach, as well as the absence of mining, implies that a significant part of the nodes will never "see" most of the transactions, therefore, they will not spend resources on their provision. As a result, Corda's great potential to scale.
Besides, the platform has attracted investors, since it implements an innovative approach to raising capital: the rights to the platform's capabilities are distributed in accordance with equity participation. In other words, if an investor bought 20% of tokens of a blockchain-startup launched at EOS, then he owns 20% of the resources of this project: income, property, copyrights, reputation.
In addition, holders of tokens of a new project may:
- get access to DApps developed under the new project;
- provide access to system storage;
- to take part in project management;
- charge a transaction fee;
- participate in airdrop;
- receive dividends from EOS.
The cryptocurrency fund Multicoin Capital claims that thanks to such attractive prospects, the EOS developers managed to raise over $2 billion by reselling tokens in small lots. In other words, the interest in this framework is huge!
In its structure, the IOTA framework is not similar to Ethereum, Bitcoin, or other popular blockchains, since there is no traditional linear block chain structure. This structure limits the scalability of the network, so IOTA instead uses the Tangle algorithm: for the user to receive confirmation for his transaction, he must confirm the transactions of two other users.
IOTA has such features:
- the ability to create isolated clusters that can work separately from the rest of the network;
- the more users and operations, the higher the rate of transactions;
- instant online and offline transactions.
In the autumn of 2018, XRP ranked second in terms of capitalization, displacing Ethereum from it - 12.3 billion against $ 9.5 billion as of December 10, 2018. This happened against the background of another sinking of the market, which indicates a great confidence of investors and users to the Ripple blockchain.
Quorum uses Raft or Istanbul BFT consensus algorithms instead of Proof-of-Work to authenticate transactions. In Raft, when a new transaction appears, it is sent to the main node, which directs the transaction to other nodes, requesting confirmation of authenticity without any communication between them. BFT differs in that this variation of the consensus algorithm has more main nodes.
Advantages of BFT and Raft - the potential for scaling, instant and cheap transactions, as well as the ability to control the "communication" between the nodes to ensure the privacy of operations. Disadvantages - centralization. But for banks it’s even good.